{"id":117272,"date":"2025-11-28T11:59:01","date_gmt":"2025-11-28T16:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/?p=117272"},"modified":"2025-11-29T10:48:57","modified_gmt":"2025-11-29T15:48:57","slug":"best-bet-texas-am-texas-betting-picks-week-14-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/betting\/best-bet-texas-am-texas-betting-picks-week-14-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas A&#038;M vs. Texas: Week 14 Betting Pick &#038; Prediction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This season, I\u2019m breaking down a few of college football's biggest games each week and giving out at least one bet I like from each matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s dive into one of the biggest games of rivalry week as Texas A&M visits Austin to take on the Longhorns for the first time since 2010.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Texas A&M vs. Texas, current line:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M -1.5 at Novig<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Texas A&M at Texas Best Bet Prediction:<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Longhorns have not fared well as an underdog lately, so let's <strong>take Texas A&M against the spread<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Texas A&M vs. Texas, best line: Texas A&M -1.5<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>\u00bb<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"> <b>Bet it now at Novig: Texas A&M -1.5 points<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Texas A&M is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Aggies run a slightly pass-heavy offense, though it\u2019s a fairly conservative scheme orchestrated by coordinator<\/span><b> Collin Klein<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to <a href=\"https:\/\/campus2canton.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Campus2Canton<\/a>, A&M\u2019s pass rate is 2.6% above expected based on situational data.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite the pass-centric offense, the Aggies tend to rely heavily on underneath routes \u4e00 50% of their throws are five or fewer yards downfield \u4e00 which makes it slightly more vulnerable to getting slowed by certain defenses.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even with the conservative passing attack, the Aggies have been explosive thanks to receivers <\/span><b>KC Concepcion <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>Mario Craver<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who are capable of considerable damage after the catch.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Aggies offense is averaging 20 or more yards on 8.6% of plays, the nation\u2019s 13th-best explosive play rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although Texas has one of the top defenses in the nation, one of its few weaknesses is preventing damage after the catch on shorter throws.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Take a look at how these teams stack up on throws five or fewer yards downfield, via stats from <a href=\"https:\/\/pro.sisdatahub.com\/cfb\/Leaders\/Players#\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sports Info Solutions<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: 7.2 yards per attempt, ranked 4th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: 5.3 yards per attempt allowed, ranked 69th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: 10.0 yards per reception, ranked 1st<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: 6.2 yards per reception allowed, ranked 50th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kentucky and Mississippi State exploited this weakness in the Texas defense most efficiently (no one had more throws of five or fewer yards against Texas this year), and both games were surprisingly competitive.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out the stats on those short throws from those two contests:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kentucky: 26-29, 185 yards<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mississippi State: 14-22, 155 yards<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fortunately for Texas, safety <\/span><b>Michael Taaffe<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who missed the Mississippi State game, is back in action, which helps the Longhorns' ability to defend those types of passes.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, linebacker <\/span><b>Anthony Hill Jr.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was out last week, and his status for Friday is uncertain.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A&M\u2019s tendency to get rid of the ball quickly also helps negate Texas\u2019 pass rush, which likely gives the Aggies an edge in that area based on these opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: ranked 8th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: ranked 32nd in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Longhorn defense is most vulnerable when it can't get consistent pressure due to an inconsistent secondary.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When failing to generate pressure, Texas ranks 66th in completion rate allowed (68%) and 51st in yards per attempt (7.3).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the run game, the Longhorns are more likely to have an edge based on these opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: ranked 19th in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: ranked 5th in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: ranked 76th in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: ranked 8th in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Since Klein\u2019s offense relies on heavier formations, opposing defenses have been able to stack the box against 63% of rush attempts at the nation\u2019s 20th-highest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That trend further tips the scales in Texas\u2019 favor, as the Longhorns are giving up just 3.3 yards per attempt with a stacked box (ranked 17th) while stopping 27% of those carries for zero or negative yards (ranked 13th).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fortunately for the Aggies, they should get running back <\/span><b>Rueben Owens<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> back (he missed last week\u2019s contest due to injury), and there\u2019s a slight chance <\/span><b>Le\u2019Veon Moss<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> could return, as well.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moss hasn\u2019t played since Week 7, but was the starter through the Aggies' first six games.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the event neither can play, <\/span><b>Amari Daniels <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">would likely make his second start of the season, though the 5-foot-8, 197-pound ball carrier is not the ideal fit for Klein\u2019s scheme.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas\u2019 ability to stop the run could prove particularly valuable if it can force A&M into tough down-and-distance situations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Since the Aggies don\u2019t throw downfield often or with a ton of success, A&M struggles on third and long with a 19% conversion rate, ranked 89th.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another potential issue for the Aggie offense is penalties.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A&M ranks 115th in penalty yardage per game (64.7), with much of it coming on offensive holding calls (third most in the country).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Texas is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas runs a pass-heavy offense, throwing the ball at a rate 5.7% above expected based on situational data from Campus2Canton.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The pass-centric approach is in line with <\/span><b>Steve Sarkisian<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019s past tendencies, but even more necessary this season due to an inept run game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas ranks 110th in total rushing yards this year, but there\u2019s a chance the Longhorns could find some success on the ground against the Aggies, which would certainly help<\/span><b> Arch Manning<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and the passing attack.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s check out some opponent-adjusted numbers on the ground game from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: ranked 115th in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: ranked 29th in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: ranked 101st in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: ranked 123rd in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Those numbers mostly favor A&M, but Sark\u2019s spread scheme could create some issues for the Aggies.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Thanks to Sark\u2019s offensive approach, Texas running backs have faced a light box 61% of the time \u4e00 average is 48%.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That\u2019s problematic for the Aggie run defense, which is allowing 4.2 yards before contact to running backs (ranked 126th) and 6.0 yards per carry (ranked 111th).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Those trends are concerning for the Aggies, but they certainly don\u2019t guarantee success on the ground for Texas.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The worst light-box run defense Texas has faced on its SEC schedule is Florida (ranked 101st in yards per attempt), and <\/span><b>Tre Wisner<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> carried the ball eight times for 11 yards in a loss to the Gators.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although Texas has been more productive in the passing game, there are significant concerns in that area as well.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The biggest issue for the Texas offense has been Manning\u2019s inability to process from the pocket \u4e00 an issue that has shown up consistently in big games due to Sark\u2019s play-calling tendencies.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Take a look at Manning\u2019s numbers on traditional dropbacks (three or more steps), via Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">54% completion rate, ranked 92nd<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8.8 yards per attempt, ranked 41st<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">51% pressure rate, ranked 123rd<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Now compare that to his numbers on quick dropbacks (zero\/one-step drops and RPOs):<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">75% completion rate, ranked 22nd<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.6 yards per attempt, ranked 35th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">18% pressure rate, ranked 34th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An inexperienced quarterback struggling on plays that take longer to develop isn\u2019t uncommon, but it\u2019s noteworthy in this matchup due to Sark\u2019s play-calling tendencies.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When playing with a lead, Manning\u2019s traditional dropback rate is 56%, but it jumps to 69% when the Longhorns are playing from behind.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sark probably leans on traditional dropbacks when trailing because it's easier to attack downfield and produce explosive plays on those types of play calls, but he\u2019s ignoring Manning\u2019s lack of consistent production.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This trend was an issue just two weeks ago against Georgia, as evidenced by Manning\u2019s numbers from that game:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Quick dropbacks: 14 of 18, 119 yards, touchdown<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Traditional dropbacks: 12 of 24, 117 yards, interception<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And that was against a Georgia defense with a relatively ordinary pass rush \u4e00 the Bulldogs rank 80th in opponent-adjusted pressure rate generated.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So let\u2019s check out the pass protection battle in this game, based on opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas: ranked 111th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Texas A&M: ranked 18th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Aggies also rank fifth in pressure rate generated against traditional dropbacks (53%).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So while Manning could have success if the Longhorns gain an early lead, the game is likely to spiral out of control (as it did against Georgia) if Texas falls behind early.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Final Thoughts on Texas vs. Texas A&M Best Bets<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the Longhorn defense could cause some problems for the Aggies, it\u2019s tough to trust Manning to get the job done \u4e00 so <\/span><b>let\u2019s play Texas A&M against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s also worth noting that Sark does not fare well as an underdog.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Since arriving at Texas, his team has pulled off just one upset (2023 at Alabama) and is just 2-7 against the spread as an underdog.<\/span><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"sf_image_divider\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/themes\/Avada-child\/img\/red_lines-separate.png\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This season, I\u2019m breaking down a few of college football&#8217;s  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20699,"featured_media":117327,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Texas A&M vs. Texas: Week 14 Betting Pick & Prediction","_seopress_titles_desc":"We give you our college football prediction for Texas vs. Texas A&M when betting against the spread, breaking down Week 14 of the 2025 NCAA season.","_seopress_robots_index":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-117272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-betting","tag-articles"],"acf":[],"featured_image_urls":{"medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-300x200.jpg","thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-150x150.jpg","medium_large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-768x512.jpg","custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-694x683.jpg","custom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-300x300.jpg","podcast-custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-350x350.jpg","homecustom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-500x500.jpg","viz-thumb":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-255x140.jpg","amp-wp-small":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-100x100.jpg","amp-wp-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-738x430.jpg","amp-wp-normal":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-230x160.jpg","blog-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-669x272.jpg","blog-medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-320x202.jpg","recent-posts":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/KC-Concepcion-Week-14-2025-700x441.jpg"},"appp_media":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20699"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117272"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":117371,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117272\/revisions\/117371"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/117327"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}