{"id":117356,"date":"2025-11-29T10:45:46","date_gmt":"2025-11-29T15:45:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/?p=117356"},"modified":"2025-11-30T09:25:15","modified_gmt":"2025-11-30T14:25:15","slug":"best-bet-alabama-auburn-betting-picks-week-14-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/betting\/best-bet-alabama-auburn-betting-picks-week-14-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Alabama vs. Auburn: Week 14 Betting Pick &#038; Prediction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This season, I\u2019m breaking down a few of college football's biggest games each week and giving out at least one bet I like from each matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s dive into this year's Iron Bowl as Auburn hopes to knock Alabama out of the playoff picture.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Alabama vs. Auburn, current line:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama -6 at Novig<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Alabama at Auburn Best Bet Prediction:<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This looks like a brand new Auburn team since firing Hugh Freeze, so let's <strong>take Auburn against the spread and bet the over<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Alabama vs. Auburn, best line: Auburn +6 and over 46.5<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>\u00bb<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"> <b>Bet it now at Novig: Auburn +6 points<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Alabama is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama runs a pass-heavy offense under<\/span><b> Kalen DeBoer<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and coordinator <\/span><b>Ryan Grubb<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and will almost certainly lean heavily on quarterback<\/span><b> Ty Simpson<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in this matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn boasts one of the nation\u2019s top rushing defenses, and it\u2019s hard to imagine Alabama having any consistent success on the ground in this game based on these opponent-adjusted numbers from <a href=\"https:\/\/pro.sisdatahub.com\/cfb\/Leaders\/Players#\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sports Info Solutions<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 31st in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn: ranked 4th in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 122nd in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn: ranked 9th in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Tide have found success against certain defenses by forcing teams into light boxes, but that won\u2019t faze Auburn.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With six or fewer defenders in the box, Auburn is allowing just 3.4 yards per carry, the nation\u2019s fourth-lowest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So Alabama will need to lean on the passing game, but that won\u2019t necessarily be easy either.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For Alabama to move the ball on offense, it will need to protect Simpson, and it should be a good battle in the trenches based on these opponent-adjusted stats from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 21st in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn: ranked 16th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The key to the game could be the health of Auburn\u2019s star lineman <\/span><b>Keldric Faulk<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, a potential top-10 NFL draft pick.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Faulk was injured last week against Mercer and did not return.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Interim head coach <\/span><b>D.J. Durkin<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> says Faulk is fine \u4e00 which is plausible as it wouldn\u2019t make sense to risk putting him back in against Mercer \u4e00 but we won\u2019t know for certain until we see him in action.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Auburn can get pressure on Simpson, it can derail the Alabama offense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Take a look at Simpson\u2019s numbers with and without pressure, via Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under pressure: 5.6 yards per attempt, ranked 92nd<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kept clean: 9.2 yards per attempt, ranked 21st<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With or without pressure, Simpson is going to take shots downfield as the deep passing game is the focal point of this Alabama offense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Outside the red zone, 26% of Alabama attempts have been at least 15 yards downfield, and Simpson has completed 51% of those throws (ranked 21st).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn\u2019s downfield pass defense has not been as dominant as its pass rush, allowing a 37% completion rate at that depth, ranked 41st.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s also worth noting that starting slot corner <strong>Sylvester Smith<\/strong> will miss the first half of this game due to a targeting call last week.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That\u2019s a devastating blow to the Auburn defense due to Alabama's tendency to line up its playmakers in the slot.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Leading receivers <\/span><b>Germie Bernard<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><b>Ryan Williams<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> have each received over half their targets while lined up in the slot this season.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn\u2019s secondary is also likely to be tested on some critical third-and-long situations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Tigers force opponents into third and long at the nation\u2019s 24th-highest rate, and Alabama\u2019s likely struggles in the run game mean there should be opportunities for Auburn to get off the field with some clutch third-down stops.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, Alabama ranks a respectable 32nd in third-and-long conversion rate (26%), while Auburn's defense only ranks 109th (also at 26%).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Based on all of these numbers, it looks like we should expect a boom-or-bust day from the Tide offense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn certainly has the run defense and the pass rush to cause some problems, but the Tide are likely to hit some big plays in the passing game and could score quickly on some drives to make up for occasional struggles.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Auburn is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If you haven\u2019t watched Auburn since <\/span><b>Hugh Freeze<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was shown the door, you might be in for a treat.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Derrick Nix<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> has taken over the play calling, and it looks like a completely different unit now that they\u2019re out from Freeze\u2019s surprisingly conservative approach that plagued the Tigers earlier.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nix has made Auburn a more pass-heavy offense during his two games at the helm of the offense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to <a href=\"https:\/\/campus2canton.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Campus2Canton<\/a>, Auburn\u2019s pass rate was 0.2% below expected based on situation data under Freeze.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That rate has jumped to 2.0% above expected under Nix.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The most notable change to the offense, however, actually occurred during Feeze\u2019s final game when<\/span><b> Ashton Daniels<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, a transfer from Stanford, took over for <\/span><b>Jackson Arnold<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> at quarterback.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Arnold, a former five-star recruit who transferred in from Oklahoma, had the pedigree but couldn\u2019t get out of his own way.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When facing pressure, Arnold took a sack 32% of the time, the nation\u2019s second-worst rate, according to Sports Info Solutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And Freeze should have seen this coming, as Arnold had the sixth-worst rate (30%) last year at Oklahoma \u4e00 almost double Daniels\u2019 15.6% rate for the Cardinal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Daniels is also the better passer, by a wide margin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Based on route-adjusted data, Daniels\u2019 on-target rate was 12.1% above expected last season, the third-highest rate among power-conference quarterbacks behind only two NFL draft picks:<\/span><b> Jaxson Dart<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><b>Will Howard<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Arnold ranked 46th out of 70 qualifiers at 0.1% below expected.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And on throws 10 or more yards downfield, Arnold\u2019s completion rate of 32% ranked 143rd out of 147 in 2024 with the Sooners \u4e00 Daniels wasn\u2019t great, but his 45% (ranked 90th) was a step up.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite having plenty of talent at wide receiver in the form of superstar sophomore <\/span><b>Cam Coleman<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and Georgia Tech transfer<\/span><b> Eric Singleton<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Arnold completed just 41% of his throws at that depth \u4e00 Daniels is completing 53%.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So it shouldn\u2019t come as much surprise that the combination of Daniels and Nix immediately took Auburn\u2019s offense to new heights, scoring 38 points on Vandy in an overtime loss.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last week against Mercer, Daniels took the day off in order to preserve his redshirt, but he will be back this week to appear in his fourth game of the season.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So can Auburn keep it rolling against Alabama?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the reasons for Auburn to be optimistic is the battle in the trenches.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Based on this opponent-adjusted data from Sports Info Solutions, Auburn should be able to protect Daniels:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn: ranked 66th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 98th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn leans on quick dropbacks (zero\/one-step dropbacks and RPOs) at a high rate, which will make it almost impossible for the Tide to consistently get to Daniels.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against Vandy, Daniels used a quick dropback 71% of the time, a huge leap from Arnold\u2019s 51% rate under Freeze.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And Daniels was brilliant on those plays, completing 72% of his passes for 8.1 yards per attempt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama hasn\u2019t faced a ton of teams that rely on quick dropbacks, so this will be a unique test \u4e00 only eight defenses have faced fewer quick dropbacks all year.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another critical factor in this game will be Auburn\u2019s performance on RPOs, which has accounted for 36% of its offense this year (the eighth-highest rate) and 29% of its offense during Daniels\u2019 last start against Vandy.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is noteworthy because Alabama ranks 91st in yards per play allowed against RPOs (5.9), per Sports Info Solutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn\u2019s RPO game has been mediocre overall (5.6 yards per play, ranked 63rd), but the Tigers gashed Vanderbilt for 7.3 yards per play.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Vandy ranks 89th in yards per play allowed to RPOS, slightly ahead of Alabama, so it\u2019s reasonable to believe a similar performance is possible.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Regardless of Auburn\u2019s performance on RPOs, its running backs should have success on the ground based on these opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn: ranked 9th in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 112th in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn: ranked 29th in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 10th in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even under Freeze, Auburn\u2019s spread offense tended to create light boxes at a high rate (64% on the season), but it has reached another level with Nix calling plays.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn running backs have faced six or fewer defenders in the box on 86% of their carries over the last two weeks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If this trend continues, it sets a high floor for their production against a mediocre Alabama run defense, which ranks 46th in yards per attempt allowed with a light box (4.9).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Given the edge Auburn appears to have in both the pass and run game, it\u2019s hard to imagine Alabama shutting down this Tigers offense entirely.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Expect Auburn to have enough firepower to move the ball and keep this game interesting.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Final Thoughts on Auburn vs. Alabama Best Bets<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Put some faith in Auburn\u2019s offensive turnaround.<\/span><b> Bet Auburn against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><b>bet the over at 46.5 points<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auburn smashed the over by 28 and 36 points in its two games since Freeze\u2019s firing.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although it\u2019s a small sample size, there\u2019s more than enough talent on Auburn\u2019s offense to believe this turnaround is real and Freeze was just getting in the way.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"sf_image_divider\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/themes\/Avada-child\/img\/red_lines-separate.png\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This season, I\u2019m breaking down a few of college football&#8217;s  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20699,"featured_media":117434,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Alabama vs. Auburn: Week 14 Betting Pick & Prediction","_seopress_titles_desc":"We give you our college football prediction for Auburn vs. Alabama when betting against the spread, breaking down Week 14 of the 2025 NCAA season.","_seopress_robots_index":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-117356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-betting","tag-articles"],"acf":[],"featured_image_urls":{"medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-300x200.jpg","thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-150x150.jpg","medium_large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-768x512.jpg","custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-694x683.jpg","custom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-300x300.jpg","podcast-custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-350x350.jpg","homecustom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-500x500.jpg","viz-thumb":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-255x140.jpg","amp-wp-small":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-100x100.jpg","amp-wp-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-738x430.jpg","amp-wp-normal":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-230x160.jpg","blog-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-669x272.jpg","blog-medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-320x202.jpg","recent-posts":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Ty-Simpson-Week-14-2025-700x441.jpg"},"appp_media":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20699"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117356"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117356\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":117435,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117356\/revisions\/117435"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/117434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}