{"id":119825,"date":"2025-12-31T09:00:12","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T14:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/?p=119825"},"modified":"2025-12-31T16:45:25","modified_gmt":"2025-12-31T21:45:25","slug":"best-bet-alabama-indiana-betting-picks-college-football-playoff-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/betting\/best-bet-alabama-indiana-betting-picks-college-football-playoff-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Alabama vs. Indiana: College Football Playoff Betting Pick &#038; Prediction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This season, I\u2019m breaking down a few of college football's biggest games each week and giving out at least one bet I like from each matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s check out this year's Rose Bowl matchup between one of the bluest of blue bloods, Alabama, and traditional doormat, Indiana.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Alabama vs. Indiana, current line:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana -7.5 at Novig<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Alabama vs. Indiana Best Bet Prediction:<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It still sounds weird to say, but the Hoosiers are the more physical, well-rounded team on both sides of the ball, so lay the points and <strong>take Indiana against the spread<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Alabama vs. Indiana, best line: Indiana -7<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>\u00bb<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"> <b>Bet it now at Novig: Indiana -7.5 points<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Alabama is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama leans heavily on the passing game, partially because that\u2019s the typical tendency of <\/span><b>Kalen DeBoer<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and coordinator <\/span><b>Ryan Grubb<\/b>,<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> but also because the Tide simply have no running game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Based on these opponent-adjusted numbers from <a href=\"https:\/\/pro.sisdatahub.com\/cfb\/Leaders\/Players#\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sports Info Solutions<\/a>, there\u2019s little chance of Alabama moving the ball on the ground in this matchup:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 31st in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 3rd in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 117th in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 17th in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether Alabama can move the ball through the air will depend on its ability to protect <\/span><b>Ty Simpson<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although Simpson is having a breakout season, Alabama\u2019s passing game has struggled when the offensive line can\u2019t keep the pocket clean.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out Simpson\u2019s yards per attempt this season with and without pressure:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under pressure: 5.5, ranked 90th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No pressure: 8.4, ranked 40th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama\u2019s pass protection has been one of the strengths of the team, but it might be at a disadvantage against the Hoosiers based on this opponent-adjusted data from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 29th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 10th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana\u2019s pass-rush unit won\u2019t be at full strength, however, after losing <\/span><b>Stephen Daley<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to an injury during the Big Ten Championship Game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the Hoosiers still have leading pass rusher <\/span><b>Mikail Kamara<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, the loss of Daley is a devastating blow because he had already been filling in for starter<\/span><b> Kellan Wyatt<\/b>, <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">who was lost for the year in October.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sophomore <\/span><b>Daniel Ndukwe<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> will likely take the majority of snaps in place of Daley, though he has seen limited playing time and didn\u2019t get his first defensive reps until after Wyatt\u2019s injury.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ndukwe has been productive in his limited role, however, generating a 13% pressure rate (Daley\u2019s was 11%).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fortunately for Indiana, Simpson takes traditional dropbacks 59% of the time, which increases the odds of generating pressure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against traditional dropbacks, the Hoosiers are generating a 48% pressure rate, ranked 21st.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s also possible that Indiana increases its blitz rate in an effort to mask the loss of Daley.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the Hoosiers rank 108th in blitz rate this year, their many blowouts are a factor in that trend.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana blitzed 28% of the time against Ohio State and 26% of the time against Oregon, indicating a willingness to use that strategy in big games.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An elevated blitz rate would not only help the depleted pass-rush unit, but it\u2019s also a good strategy against Simpson in general.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out Simpson\u2019s numbers against the blitz compared to standard pressure, via Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><div class='jtrt_table_MotherShipContainer'><div class='jtTableContainer jtrespo-scroll  ' ><div class='jtsettingcontainer' style='display:none;position:absolute;left:-9999px;'><textarea data-jtrt-table-id='119771' id='jtrt_table_settings_119771' cols='30' rows='10'>[[[\"\",\"Comp Pct (Rank)\",\"Yds\\\/Att (Rank)\",\"Positive EPA Rate (Rank)\"],[\"No Blitz\",\"68% (26th)\",\"7.9 (39th)\",\"50% (19th)\"],[\"Blitz\",\"56% (105th)\",\"7.1 (86th)\",\"43% (80th)\"]],[{\"row\":0,\"col\":0,\"visualRow\":0,\"visualCol\":0,\"prop\":0},{\"row\":0,\"col\":1,\"visualRow\":0,\"visualCol\":1,\"prop\":1},{\"row\":0,\"col\":2,\"visualRow\":0,\"visualCol\":2,\"prop\":2},{\"row\":0,\"col\":3,\"visualRow\":0,\"visualCol\":3,\"prop\":3},{\"row\":1,\"col\":0,\"visualRow\":1,\"visualCol\":0,\"prop\":0},{\"row\":1,\"col\":1,\"visualRow\":1,\"visualCol\":1,\"prop\":1},{\"row\":1,\"col\":2,\"visualRow\":1,\"visualCol\":2,\"prop\":2},{\"row\":1,\"col\":3,\"visualRow\":1,\"visualCol\":3,\"prop\":3},{\"row\":2,\"col\":0,\"visualRow\":2,\"visualCol\":0,\"prop\":0},{\"row\":2,\"col\":1,\"visualRow\":2,\"visualCol\":1,\"prop\":1},{\"row\":2,\"col\":2,\"visualRow\":2,\"visualCol\":2,\"prop\":2},{\"row\":2,\"col\":3,\"visualRow\":2,\"visualCol\":3,\"prop\":3}],[],[]]<\/textarea><textarea data-jtrt-table-id='119771' id='jtrt_table_bps_119771' cols='30' rows='10'>[]<\/textarea><\/div><table id='jtrt_table_119771' data-sorting='false' data-paging='false' data-paging-size='10' data-paging-menu='10,20,50,100' data-filtering='false' data-jtrt-table-id='119771' class='jtrt-table  ' ><thead><tr><th><\/th><th>Comp Pct (Rank)<\/th><th>Yds\/Att (Rank)<\/th><th>Positive EPA Rate (Rank)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>No Blitz<\/td><td>68% (26th)<\/td><td>7.9 (39th)<\/td><td>50% (19th)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Blitz<\/td><td>56% (105th)<\/td><td>7.1 (86th)<\/td><td>43% (80th)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When Simpson has time to throw, he\u2019s likely to take some shots downfield against a boom-or-bust Indiana secondary.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Outside the red zone, 24% of Alabama throws are at least 15 yards downfield with a 46% completion rate (ranked 42nd).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the Tide can protect Simpson long enough to get off those throws, he could have success against an Indiana secondary that ranks 84th in completion rate allowed at that depth (43%).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, attacking Indiana downfield comes with risks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosiers have 17 interceptions this season, and that number is certainly no fluke based on their ball-hawk rate numbers:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Overall: 14%, ranked 30th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On throws of 10 or more yards: 22%, ranked 18th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Simpson has been prone to putting the ball in harm\u2019s way, as well.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although he has just 5 interceptions on the year, opponents have generated an 18% ball-hawk rate on throws 10 or more yards downfield, ranked 87th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another trend likely to impact this game is Alabama\u2019s lack of success on early downs.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Tide has faced third-down attempts on 51% of their sets of downs, ranked 105th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That concerning trend explains their offensive struggles despite the explosive ability of the offense, and it\u2019s likely to cause problems against the Hoosiers.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana ranks seventh in third-down force rate, putting opponents in third-down situations 56% of the time.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosiers then allow third-down conversions just 28% of the time, ranked third, while Alabama has a mediocre 42% conversion rate, ranked 40th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama\u2019s offense is certainly talented enough to make some plays, but if Indiana can turn this game into a shootout, it\u2019s tough to envision the Tide keeping pace.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>When Indiana is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana runs a balanced offense and should have no issues running or throwing the ball against an inconsistent Alabama defense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the passing game, the Hoosiers should be able to give <\/span><b>Fernando Mendoza<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> plenty of time in the pocket based on these opponent-adjusted numbers:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 21st in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 110th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama has played five games against teams ranked in the top 50 of opponent-adjusted pressure rate allowed (Oklahoma x2, Georgia x2, and LSU), and the Tide generated a pressure rate of 26% or worse in four of those contests.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When given time in the pocket, Mendoza has been nearly unstoppable, completing 77% of his passes at an FBS-leading 10.1 yards per attempt.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the reasons it has been hard to get pressure on Mendoza is the Hoosiers\u2019 tendency to rely on quick dropbacks (zero\/one-step dropbacks and RPOs).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana uses quick dropbacks on 47% of its pass plays, the nation\u2019s 20th-highest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fortunately for Alabama, it has the athletes in the secondary to close quickly and limit yards after catch on those quick pass plays.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Tide are allowing just 5.8 yards per attempt against quick dropbacks, ranked 26th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Since Indiana so frequently attacks underneath, its standard game plan naturally minimizes one of Alabama\u2019s greatest strengths on defense, the downfield passing game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Outside the red zone, Alabama allows a 35% completion rate on throws 15 or more yards downfield (ranked 26th), but Indiana only attempts those throws an average of 5 times per game (ranked 110th).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Alabama has some success slowing down the passing attack, Indiana should be able to pivot to a more run-heavy approach based on these opponent-adjusted stats from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 24th in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 104th in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 34th in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alabama: ranked 12th in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana lines up in heavier formations at a relatively high rate, which allows defenses to stack the box, but this Alabama team is not as physical as many past versions under <\/span><b>Nick Saban<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When lined up with a stacked box, Alabama allows 4.4 yards per attempt, ranked 71st.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Due to its ability to run the ball, Indiana excels at avoiding tough down-and-distance situations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosiers have found themselves in third-and-long situations on just 13% of their sets of downs, the second-lowest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To be fair, Alabama\u2019s defense has forced third-and-longs at a high rate (21st), but if we\u2019re expecting Indiana to win the battle in the trenches in pass protection and in the ground game, that greatly reduces the odds of Alabama creating the negative plays necessary to force those situations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Final Thoughts on Indiana vs. Alabama Best Bets<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Statistically, this game looks like a mismatch on many levels, so lay the points and<\/span><b> take Indiana against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana is one of the most well-rounded teams in the country, while Alabama has some glaring flaws that the Hoosiers should be able to expose.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This could be a close game if the Alabama defense steps up, but if Mendoza gets rolling in the passing game, expect an easy Indiana victory.<\/span><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"sf_image_divider\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/themes\/Avada-child\/img\/red_lines-separate.png\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This season, I\u2019m breaking down a few of college football&#8217;s  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20699,"featured_media":111694,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Alabama vs. Indiana: College Football Playoff Betting Pick & Prediction","_seopress_titles_desc":"We give you our college football prediction for Indiana vs. Alabama when betting against the spread, breaking down the College Football Playoff matchup.","_seopress_robots_index":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-119825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-betting","tag-articles"],"acf":[],"featured_image_urls":{"medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-300x200.jpg","thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-150x150.jpg","medium_large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-768x512.jpg","custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-694x683.jpg","custom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-300x300.jpg","podcast-custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-350x350.jpg","homecustom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-500x500.jpg","viz-thumb":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-255x140.jpg","amp-wp-small":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-100x100.jpg","amp-wp-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-738x430.jpg","amp-wp-normal":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-230x160.jpg","blog-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-669x272.jpg","blog-medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-320x202.jpg","recent-posts":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Fernando-Mendoza-Week-4-2025-700x441.jpg"},"appp_media":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20699"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119825"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":119904,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119825\/revisions\/119904"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/111694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}