{"id":120136,"date":"2026-01-09T11:00:48","date_gmt":"2026-01-09T16:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/?p=120136"},"modified":"2026-01-10T09:45:43","modified_gmt":"2026-01-10T14:45:43","slug":"best-bet-oregon-indiana-betting-picks-college-football-playoff-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/betting\/best-bet-oregon-indiana-betting-picks-college-football-playoff-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Oregon vs. Indiana: College Football Playoff Betting Pick &#038; Prediction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This season, I've been breaking down a few of college football's biggest games each week and giving out at least one bet I like from each matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s dive into a regular-season rematch in the Peach Bowl between Oregon and Indiana.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Oregon vs. Indiana, current line:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana -3.5 at Novig<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Oregon vs. Indiana Best Bet Prediction:<\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first meeting was mostly a defensive struggle that came down to the wire, so let\u2019s take the underdog and <\/span><b>play Oregon against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Oregon vs. Indiana, best line: Oregon +3.5<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>\u00bb<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"> <b>Bet it now at Novig: Oregon +3.5 points<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Oregon is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Oregon runs a balanced offense under coordinator <\/span><b>Will Stein<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who will be leaving the Ducks after they\u2019re eliminated to take the head coaching job at Kentucky.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When these teams met in October, the Ducks were surprisingly effective on the ground against a nasty Indiana run defense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the official box score shows Oregon averaged just 2.7 yards per attempt, that stat was dramatically skewed by 6 sacks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Oregon running backs averaged 5.0 yards per carry against Indiana, the most allowed by the Hoosiers all year.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the reasons for the Ducks' success was their ability to avoid early contact.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to <a href=\"https:\/\/pro.sisdatahub.com\/cfb\/Leaders\/Players#\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sports Info Solutions<\/a>, Indiana contacted Oregon running backs at or behind the line of scrimmage just 25% of the time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosiers' next lowest rate was 39%, and they ranked third in the country with an average early contact rate of 55%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Oregon\u2019s rushing attack has only improved since that meeting, as the Ducks have figured out their strength is lining up in heavier formations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Through the Indiana game, 52% of the Ducks' handoffs occurred when in formations with 12 or 21 personnel, but that rate has jumped to 65% in the weeks since.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It has been a winning strategy for Oregon, as it\u2019s averaging 6.7 yards per carry from 12 and 21 personnel compared to 5.5 in all other formations, per Sports Info Solutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although Indiana\u2019s run defense has been strong against all types of schemes, it has been slightly less dominant against these heavier formations:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against 12 and 21 personnel: 3.4 yards per attempt allowed, ranked 18th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against all others: 3.2 yards per attempt allowed, ranked 5th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As for the passing game, protecting <\/span><b>Dante Moore<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> will be critical if Oregon is to improve upon its production from the previous matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana generated a 50% pressure rate against the Ducks last time, the highest rate Oregon had allowed since a 2020 game against UCLA.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, these opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions indicate it should be a fair fight in the trenches:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Oregon: ranked 6th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: ranked 13th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The biggest concern for Indiana is its depth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosiers will be without edge rusher <\/span><b>Stephen Daley<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who was lost to an injury during the Big Ten title game<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Daley had begun the year as part of the defensive line rotation, but stepped into a starting role when<\/span><b> Kellan Wyatt <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">was lost for the year in October.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Both Daley and Wyatt were active when these teams met in Week 7, combining for 7 pressures and 1.5 sacks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Daley\u2019s absence in the Rose Bowl mostly went unnoticed due to Indiana\u2019s dominance of Alabama, but the Hoosiers\u2019 pass-rush production dropped significantly.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana generated a decent 34% pressure rate on the day, but much of that production came late after Alabama backup<\/span><b> Austin Mack <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">was forced into the game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Before his injury, <\/span><b>Ty Simpson<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> had faced pressure on just 21% of his dropbacks, the lowest rate Indiana generated against an individual quarterback this season (minimum 10 dropbacks), per Sports Info Solutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should also be noted that Alabama was not known for its pass protection this season \u4e00 Simpson ranked 60th in pressure rate faced at 33% \u4e00 so a mediocre performance by the Hoosiers\u2019 pass-rush unit is tough to explain beyond Daley\u2019s absence.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Moore can spend more time in the pocket, it should help open up Oregon\u2019s downfield passing attack, which struggled in the previous matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In October\u2019s meeting, Moore was just 4 for 11 on throws of 10 or more yards downfield, his lowest completion rate of the year at that depth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, he was under pressure on 8 of those attempts.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For the year, only 28% of Moore\u2019s throws at that depth have been under pressure, and he\u2019s completing 64% of those attempts, the nation\u2019s second-highest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana\u2019s potential dropoff in pass rush is especially noteworthy because if the Hoosiers' defense has a weakness, it\u2019s the secondary.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out Indiana\u2019s completion rate allowed when failing to generate pressure, via Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Overall: 71%, ranked 95th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10 or more yards downfield: 49%, ranked 57th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">15 or more yards downfield, 46%, ranked 80th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This flaw has gone unnoticed due to its dominant pass rush unit \u4e00 45% of attempts at 15 or more yards downfield against Indiana have been under pressure, the seventh-highest rate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Indiana can\u2019t consistently get to Moore, however, the secondary might not hold up in this matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There\u2019s a chance Indiana increases its blitz rate to make up for the absences of Daley and Wyatt, but Moore has excelled at reacting to the blitz this season.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the first matchup, Moore was 6 for 10 for 100 yards and a touchdown against Indiana\u2019s blitz.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Only 1 of the 6 sacks occurred when the Hoosiers brought extra pressure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On the season, Moore is completing 70% of his passes against the blitz (ranked 13th) for 9.2 yards per attempt (ranked 11th).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One area where Indiana may still hold an edge is in the red zone.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosier defense leads the nation in red zone touchdown rate allowed (26%). Oregon\u2019s offense ranks 47th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So Moore might have more success moving the Ducks up and down the field, but if Indiana can force Oregon to settle for field goals (or failed fourth-down attempts), the Hoosiers can still win this game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Indiana is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana runs a balanced offense heavily featuring RPOs under coordinator <\/span><b>Mike Shanahan<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who has been <\/span><b>Curt Cignetti<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019s play-caller since the 2021 season at James Madison.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the first meeting, however, Indiana came out of the gate throwing the ball at a high rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the first half, Hoosier running backs took just eight handoffs compared to 18 dropbacks by <\/span><b>Fernando Mendoza<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the Hoosiers take a similar approach, they will need their pass protection unit to step up, though Oregon appears to hold a slight advantage based on these opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana: 20th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Oregon: ranked 5th in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That said, Indiana relies heavily on quick dropbacks, and Mendoza\u2019s ability to get the ball out quickly is a key factor in his ability to avoid pressure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosier passing attack uses quick dropbacks (zero\/one-step dropbacks and RPOs) 47% of the time, the nation\u2019s 20th-highest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Oregon defends these quick dropbacks well, ranking third in the nation in yards per attempt allowed against quick dropbacks (4.2).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So it should come as no surprise that Mendoza\u2019s numbers on these plays were muted in the first meeting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out Mendoza\u2019s stats on quick dropbacks this season, via Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against Oregon: 67% completion rate, 5.5 yards per attempt<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against others: 72% completion rate, 6.8 yards per attempt<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So long as Indiana plays with a lead \u4e00 it never trailed in the second half in the first matchup \u4e00 this quick passing attack should remain effective, even if it limits the Hoosiers' big-play ability.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Indiana falls behind, however, Mendoza might be in trouble.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To attack downfield, Mendoza needs to take more traditional dropbacks, which was an issue in the first matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On traditional dropbacks, Mendoza was just 4 for 8 for 64 yards with an interception while facing pressure 8 times (72% pressure rate) and scrambling twice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Calling traditional dropback plays has been both risky and rewarding for Shanahan\u2019s offense, and, since the Hoosiers have rarely trailed this season, he has mostly been able to remain cautious when needed.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On traditional dropbacks, Mendoza averages 12.1 yards per attempt, ranked second in the nation.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, he has also faced a 39% pressure rate, and when pressured on a traditional dropback, Mendoza takes a sack 25% of the time, ranked 118th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So while Mendoza has mastered Indiana\u2019s quick passing attack, his production when taking his time in the pocket has been more hit-or-miss, and this could be a critical factor if the Hoosiers find themselves playing from behind at some point.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the run game, Indiana found it difficult to move the ball against Oregon\u2019s front.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Its running backs gained just 3.9 yards per attempt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This was a recurring theme for the Hoosiers against the best run defenses they faced, as their running backs were held to 4.2 yards per attempt or worse against Ohio State, Oregon, Penn State, and Wisconsin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Since the Hoosiers did not dominate on the ground against any of the quality run defenses they faced, we should assume it remains a struggle for Indiana to move the ball on the ground.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As a result, Oregon likely forces a pass-heavy game play again \u4e00 at least until they build a lead, as they did in the first matchup.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite the expected mediocre results on the ground, it is worth noting that Oregon struggles to create negative plays against the run.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Ducks have stopped opposing running backs for zero or negative yards just 15% of the time this year, ranked 88th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This trend was a factor in the first meeting, as Oregon struggled to get Indiana off the field late in the game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the fourth quarter, Indiana running backs didn\u2019t have a run longer than seven yards, but 8 of their 11 carries gained at least three yards.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hoosiers' ability to consistently keep moving forward on early downs allowed them to avoid obvious passing situations, where the Ducks could more easily get them off the field.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So while there are reasons to be concerned about Indiana\u2019s offense if it falls behind, if it can gain an early lead, there's reason to be optimistic about its ability to run the ball and bleed the clock again.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Final Thoughts on Indiana vs. Oregon Best Bets<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This game was a toss-up the first time around, so the smart bet is to take the points and <\/span><b>play Oregon against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indiana\u2019s depleted pass rush is the biggest factor that could alter the way this game is played from October\u2019s meeting, so the Ducks look like the best bet while they\u2019re getting more than a field goal against the spread.<\/span><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"sf_image_divider\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/themes\/Avada-child\/img\/red_lines-separate.png\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This season, I&#8217;ve been breaking down a few of college  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20699,"featured_media":120147,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Oregon vs. Indiana: College Football Playoff Betting Pick & Prediction","_seopress_titles_desc":"We give you our college football prediction for Indiana vs. Oregon when betting against the spread, breaking down the College Football Playoff matchup.","_seopress_robots_index":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-120136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-betting","tag-articles"],"acf":[],"featured_image_urls":{"medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-300x200.jpg","thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-150x150.jpg","medium_large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-768x512.jpg","custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-694x683.jpg","custom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-300x300.jpg","podcast-custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-350x350.jpg","homecustom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-500x500.jpg","viz-thumb":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-255x140.jpg","amp-wp-small":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-100x100.jpg","amp-wp-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-738x430.jpg","amp-wp-normal":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-230x160.jpg","blog-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-669x272.jpg","blog-medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-320x202.jpg","recent-posts":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fernando-Mendoza-CFB-Semi-700x441.jpg"},"appp_media":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20699"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120136"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":120188,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120136\/revisions\/120188"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/120147"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}