{"id":120226,"date":"2026-01-08T08:30:20","date_gmt":"2026-01-08T13:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/?p=120226"},"modified":"2026-01-09T11:30:57","modified_gmt":"2026-01-09T16:30:57","slug":"best-bet-ole-miss-miami-betting-picks-college-football-playoff-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/betting\/best-bet-ole-miss-miami-betting-picks-college-football-playoff-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Ole Miss vs. Miami: College Football Playoff Betting Pick &#038; Prediction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This season, I've been breaking down a few of college football's biggest games each week and giving out at least one bet I like from each matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Let\u2019s break down the Fiesta Bowl matchup between Miami and Ole Miss.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Ole Miss vs. Miami, current line:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami -3.5 at Novig<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Ole Miss vs Miami Best Bet Prediction:<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This game is closer to a toss-up than the line indicates, so let\u2019s <\/span><b>take Ole Miss against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Ole Miss vs. Miami, best line: Ole Miss +3.5<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>\u00bb<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/novig.onelink.me\/JHQQ\/m02yw1et\"> <b>Bet it now at Novig: Ole Miss +3.5 points<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Ole Miss is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss runs <\/span><b>Lane Kiffin<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019s fast-paced, pass-heavy offense, and not much has changed in Kiffin\u2019s absence.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Coordinator <\/span><b>Charlie Weis Jr. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">was heavily involved in playcalling before Kiffin\u2019s departure and knows the offense well enough to maintain its success without his boss.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weis\u2019 relationship with Kiffin dates back to his first coaching gig as an offensive assistant when Kiffin was Alabama\u2019s coordinator.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">He then joined Kiffin at Florida Atlantic and, after a brief stop at USF, rejoined Kiffin at Ole Miss.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So far, the Ole Miss offense has not missed a beat without Kiffin, but it should be noted that Weis is joining Kiffin at LSU and was in Baton Rouge this week to assist with transfer portal recruiting.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With less time between the quarterfinal and semifinal games, Weis\u2019 lack of attention on Miami could be a factor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The key to beating Miami is slowing down its pass-rush unit, which generated an impressive 50% pressure rate against Ohio State in the Cotton Bowl.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Based on these opponent-adjusted stats from <a href=\"https:\/\/pro.sisdatahub.com\/cfb\/Leaders\/Players#\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sports Info Solutions<\/a>, it should be a good matchup in the trenches:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss: ranked 4th in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami: ranked 2nd in pressure rate generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite similar numbers, the advantage likely goes to Ole Miss due to the offensive scheme.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kiffin\u2019s offense is built to get the ball out quickly, which naturally limits the amount of pressure even the best pass-rush unit can generate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss uses quick dropbacks (zero\/one-step dropbacks and RPOs) 56% of the time, the nation\u2019s sixth-highest rate, while averaging 8.8 yards per attempt on those plays, ranked fifth.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami\u2019s pass-rush unit is talented, but even <\/span><b>Rueben Bain <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><b>Akheem Mesidor<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> can\u2019t consistently generate pressure against that scheme.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When facing quick dropbacks, the Hurricanes have generated a pressure rate of only 23%, ranking 65th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That doesn\u2019t necessarily mean the edge goes to Ole Miss\u2019 offense, however, because quick dropbacks also mean shorter throws \u4e00 so there\u2019s still time for the defense to make a quick tackle and limit the scheme\u2019s effectiveness.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This was an area where Georgia struggled \u4e00 the Bulldogs ranked 106th in yards per attempt against quick dropbacks \u4e00 and so it was a key reason why we took Ole Miss against the spread last week.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami, however, is allowing just 5.7 yards per attempt against quick dropbacks, ranked 24th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While Miami defends quick dropbacks relatively well, it is worth mentioning that the power conference quarterback who took the most quick dropbacks against Miami this year was <\/span><b>Kevin Jennings<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who led SMU to an upset win while averaging 8.4 yards per attempt on 24 quick dropbacks.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jennings threw for 365 yards in that game, the only 300-yard passing performance against the Canes this year.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another factor in the passing game will be Miami\u2019s tendency to blitz.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Coordinator <\/span><b>Corey Hetherman<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> has dialed up a blitz 34% of the time this year, the 22nd-highest rate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The blitz-heavy approach worked well last week against the less-mobile <\/span><b>Julian Sayin<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, who averaged 10.0 yards per attempt on those plays but also threw an interception and took 3 sacks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Trinidad Chambliss<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> is more athletic, however, and probably better suited to handle the extra pressure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to Sports Info Solutions, Chambliss is averaging 9.4 yards per attempt against blitzes (ranked 6th) while taking a sack 4.4% of the time (ranked 30th).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When Chambliss takes a traditional dropback of three or more steps (which he does 36% of the time), that\u2019s when Miami\u2019s pass rush unit will hold an edge.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Against traditional dropbacks, Miami is generating a 54% pressure rate (ranked 2nd), while Ole Miss\u2019 pressure rate allowed sits at 38% (ranked 30th).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the ways for Miami to force Ole Miss into more traditional dropbacks will be to create tough down-and-distance situations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On third and long, Chambliss\u2019 traditional dropback rate jumps to 65%, so those types of play calls are typically necessary to attack downfield.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami\u2019s defense ranks 14th in the nation in third-and-long force rate, but maintaining that level of success against Ole Miss might be challenging.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As previously mentioned, Ole Miss\u2019 quick passing game is a factor in staying ahead of the sticks, but its rushing attack is also tough to contain.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss\u2019 spread offense excels at creating light boxes, which has been a relative area of weakness for a Miami defense that doesn\u2019t have as many playmakers at the second level as on the line.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When lined up with a light box, Miami is allowing 4.8 yards per attempt and, perhaps more importantly, 3.1 yards before contact per carry, which ranks 69th in the country.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Miami struggles to create early contact against the run, it will be harder to force Ole Miss into those third-and-long situations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Additionally, Ole Miss tends to direct runs outside the tackles, as the theme of the offense is getting playmakers into open space as often as possible.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is also somewhat problematic for Miami\u2019s defense based on these stats from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Between the tackles: 4.0 yards per attempt allowed, ranked 24th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Outside the tackles: 4.7 yards per attempt allowed, ranked 46th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So while Miami\u2019s defense doesn\u2019t have any glaring flaws, Ole Miss\u2019 scheme does appear to be well-suited to exploit some weaknesses and potentially exceed expectations in this matchup.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n<h3><b>When Miami is on Offense<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami runs a conservative but pass-heavy offense under coordinator <strong>Shannon Dawson<\/strong>, relying heavily on<\/span><b> Carson Beck<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019s experience and his ability to distribute the ball like a point guard on underneath routes.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This strategy works well in part due to Miami\u2019s offensive line, which is likely to hold an edge over Ole Miss\u2019 pass-rush unit based on this opponent-adjusted data from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami: ranked 1st in pressure rate allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss: ranked 20th in pressure rate generated\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami\u2019s dominance in pass protection is particularly impressive since Beck takes traditional dropbacks 56% of the time.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even in traditional dropbacks, however, Miami leads the nation in pressure rate allowed at just 25%, holding a clear advantage over an Ole Miss defense that ranks 46th by the same metric.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although Beck takes traditional dropbacks at a high rate, the downfield passing attack is not a huge part of the offense.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Instead, Miami tries to get the ball in the hands of its playmakers quickly on underneath routes, with 57% of throws traveling five or fewer yards downfield, the seventh-highest rate, per Sports Info Solutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This strategy likely gives the Miami passing attack a significant edge over Ole Miss based on these numbers on throws five or fewer yards downfield:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami: 6.7 yards per attempt, ranked 7th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss: 5.5 yards per attempt allowed, ranked 77th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the reasons for Ole Miss\u2019 struggles on shorter throws is an inability to tackle in open space against the pass.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss is allowing a broken\/missed tackle once every 4.5 receptions, ranked 109th.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami\u2019s receivers rank 18th by the same metric, so we should expect to see some mistakes by the Ole Miss defense lead to extra yardage after the catch.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although this underneath passing attack has been a winning strategy for Miami, it should be pointed out that part of the motivation for the game plan is a lack of trust in Beck\u2019s downfield passing.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Beck has thrown 22 interceptions over the last two years and routinely puts the ball in harm's way when attacking downfield.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On throws 10 or more yards downfield, opponents have generated a 19% ball-hawk rate against the Canes, ranked 97th \u4e00 evidence that there\u2019s nothing fluky about Beck\u2019s interception total, as defenders are consistently getting their hands on the ball.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Downfield pass defense has been a strength of the Ole Miss defense \u4e00 it ranks sixth in completion rate allowed at 15 or more yards downfield \u4e00 so Miami is unlikely to alter its strategy and get more aggressive.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, since the Ole Miss offense has the potential to score quickly, there\u2019s a chance Miami gets forced into a shootout.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the game flow swung that direction, it would undoubtedly favor Ole Miss due to Beck\u2019s issues attacking downfield.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The run game matchup is more difficult to predict because it's not a strength for either team, as evidenced by these opponent-adjusted numbers from Sports Info Solutions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami: ranked 70th in yards before contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss: ranked 116th in yards before contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Miami: ranked 43rd in yards after contact<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ole Miss: ranked 51st in yards after contact allowed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Those stats appear to favor Miami slightly, but the Hurricanes tend to invite stacked boxes at a high rate, which plays into Ole Miss\u2019 hands.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out Ole Miss\u2019 stats based on box type:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Light box: 5.5 yards per attempt, ranked 80th<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stacked box: 3.9 yards per attempt, ranked 40th<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is similar to Ole Miss\u2019 matchup with Georgia, another power-run offense that invited stacked boxes, which allowed Ole Miss to contain the ground game.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A few weaker teams had surprising success running the ball against Ole Miss this year, such as Washington State and Mississippi State, but both teams used spread offenses to create light boxes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In fact, when Mississippi State ran for 262 yards in the Egg Bowl, its running backs did not face a single stacked box.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That won\u2019t be the case for <\/span><b>Mark Fletcher<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and Miami, so expect to see a relatively modest performance from the Canes' ground game.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Final Thoughts on Miami vs. Ole Miss Best Bets<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This should be a tight game, so let\u2019s take the underdog and <\/span><b>play Ole Miss against the spread<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is a tough game to predict because the pace of the game likely determines who has an edge, and one unlucky turnover could swing momentum dramatically.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Miami can avoid costly errors, run the ball, and slow down the pace, it likely holds an edge and can win a close game \u4e00 but so can Ole Miss.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If Ole Miss can force Miami into a shootout, however, Beck\u2019s limitations as a passer become a significant disadvantage, and Ole Miss likely holds a significant edge.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"sf_image_divider\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/themes\/Avada-child\/img\/red_lines-separate.png\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class='sfa-image-adds' style=\"margin-bottom: 20px;\">\n\t\t<a href='https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/newsletter\/'>\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sharp-Football-Analysis-Newsletter-Ad.jpg\" class=\"attachment-size-full size-size-full\" alt=\"Sharp Football Analysis Newsletter\" \/>\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This season, I&#8217;ve been breaking down a few of college  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20699,"featured_media":120240,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Ole Miss vs. Miami: College Football Playoff Betting Pick & Prediction","_seopress_titles_desc":"We give you our college football prediction for Ole Miss vs. Miami when betting against the spread, breaking down the College Football Playoff matchup.","_seopress_robots_index":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-120226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-betting","tag-articles"],"acf":[],"featured_image_urls":{"medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-300x200.jpg","thumbnail":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-150x150.jpg","medium_large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-768x512.jpg","custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-694x683.jpg","custom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-300x300.jpg","podcast-custom-size":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-350x350.jpg","homecustom-size-content":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-500x500.jpg","viz-thumb":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-255x140.jpg","amp-wp-small":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-100x100.jpg","amp-wp-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-738x430.jpg","amp-wp-normal":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-230x160.jpg","blog-large":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-669x272.jpg","blog-medium":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-320x202.jpg","recent-posts":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Trinidad-Chambliss-CFP-Semi-700x441.jpg"},"appp_media":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20699"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120226"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120226\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":120237,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120226\/revisions\/120237"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/120240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sharpfootballanalysis.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}